Yes, I agree. It would be the wrong way to get images into LR 5 for sure and certainly much more cumbersome. And as I said to Josh, it was just a diagnostic question used to reveal more of what happens with both versions operating side by side if you will. At first I thought I just wanted to have both because I thought I may want the flexibility to be able to only use LR 3 for some images if I thought it would be faster or easier and because sometimes I really do not need to do much more with an image in LR but still need LR in order to say adjust the sizing of the final image which I export while preserving quality. But of course no one could read my mind to know what I was thinking. Thanks again for your clarification.
↧